Science Writing for Researchers
Science Writing for Researchers is an 8-lecture course that combines foundational and advanced training in popular science writing. It is designed for researchers, graduate students, and postdocs who want to develop compelling science stories for public audiences across print, digital, and social platforms. Each lecture includes a 35-minute talk and a 15-minute activity and discussion period. Final deliverables include a popular science article, a suite of social media posts, and visual science art.
Course Overview
Understand the Importance of Science Writing – Explain why clear communication is essential for engaging diverse audiences.
Advocate for Science Communication – Discuss why scientists should share their work with the public and policymakers.
Format
Lecture: 35 minutes
Activity + Discussion: 15 minutes
Total Duration: 50 minutes
Final deliverables
One 800 to 1000-word popular science article
3–5 social media posts on chosen/ assigned topic
Visual storytelling piece: Zine, cover art, single panel, infographic, illustrated summary.
Final Presentation: In-class peer-reviewed pitch of an article and outreach plan.
Lecture format
Introduction
Main Concepts
Conclusion
Activity/Exercise
Discussion Prompts
Optional/ additional Videos or Readings
Lecture Plan
Lecture 1: Why Scientists Must Write
Overview
Introduction to the role of science writing as a tool for thinking, learning, and engagement. Explores language as a cognitive and communicative device.
Objectives
Recognize writing as essential to learning and sharing science
Reflect on the importance of clarity in communication
Reflective journal on the role of writing in your science
Rewrite an abstract from a scientific paper in lay language
Understand writing as both a cognitive, learning, and communicative tool
Explore the importance of science writing in society
Begin reflecting on your personal writing practice
Lecture Notes
Intro: “Language is a tool for thinking, not just expression” (Zinsser on writing well)
Writing ≠ just publishing: it is a process of refining your own ideas
Science literacy & public trust: explore Pew survey data on declining trust (Pew on science trust)
Jargon kills clarity: introduces the concept of accessibility
Social contract of science: public funding means public understanding
Alex Rivest TED Talk on Demand Better Stories https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3vFWlPsUPo
What are you interested in? What topics excite you? Why do you care about this topic? Example- Cutting-edge research, ground-breaking emerging technology, specific concepts,
Ludwig Wittgenstein, recognized as one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century, proposed that language serves as a means to represent reality. He argued that our understanding of the world is shaped by the structure and use of language. Later in his work, he delved into our understanding of abstract concepts. He wrote, “We are unable to clearly circumscribe the concepts we use; not because we don’t know their real definition, but because there is no real ‘definition’ to them.” Instead, our speech acts are grounded in a set of social practices.
Language is a tool for communication. While we might not always have the words to describe an abstract concept or idea, the only way we can clearly share our thoughts is through the use of language. Scientific concepts, much like Wittgenstein’s notion of language, often resist clear, singular definitions. This inherent complexity necessitates that scientists engage in effective communication to convey their findings accurately. By doing so, they ensure that their research is accessible and comprehensible to diverse audiences, including policymakers, educators, and the general public.
Beyond communication, language is also a tool for thinking. The process of translating complex ideas into clear, accessible language often leads to deeper insights for the writer and reader as well. When scientists and science writers articulate their work for a broader audience, they are forced to examine assumptions, clarify ambiguities, and refine their own understanding. This reflective practice through reiterative writing turns language into a cognitive tool, shaping not just how ideas are expressed, but how they are formed and developed.
Writing is a tool for learning- A study (Pelger S. 2018) found that popular science writing serves as a cognitive tool to widen science students’ perspectives, and promotes their development of scientific literacy and achievement of scientific writing skills.
Assignment
Reflective journal: Describe a recent concept you've learned and what writing taught you about it
Rewrite a scientific abstract using plain language
Identify ten topics that you find exciting, arrange them based on your level of interest, and describe the reasons behind why you find them interesting. Is there a common theme linking these topics?
Reading
Https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/science-writing-as-a-tool-for-learning/
Https://www.themarginalian.org/2015/05/27/william-zinsser-on-writing-well-science/
Alan Alda, If I Understood You, Would I Have This Look on My Face?
Tip Sheet for Newcomers to Science Writing
Pelger, S. 2018. Popular science writing bringing new perspectives into science students’ theses. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 8(1): 1–13.
Lecture 2: Popular Science Writing: Forms, Audiences, and Rules
Overview
Touch upon different forms of science writing, the rules and guidelines, and the importance of identifying and targeting specific audiences.
Objectives
Differentiate between blog, feature, news, explainer, short (social media), and editorial formats
Share tips on how to tailor language and style for different audiences – identify jargon and break down concepts
Rules and guidelines for writing well
Lecture Notes
Look at different forms: news articles, explainers, op-eds, blogs, profiles, podcasts, scripts (Find an overview of different writing formats in our Science Communicator’s toolkit)
Compare tone, structure, and voice across genres – discuss accuracy and utility for the target audience
Answer audience-related questions: what they care about, how much they know, how much is important to share, the point of the piece, etc.
Scientific literature is full of jargon and specialized terminology, creating a significant communication gap between experts and non-experts. Jargon is restrictive; it only makes sense to those familiar with the context, excluding others from grasping complex concepts.
The communication gap exists not only between scientists and the public but also between scientists from different research fields. The use of jargon reduces the number of citations of scientific papers. Journal papers today have become specialized to the point that “form that was as readable as the average newspaper has, in some fields, become a jungle of jargon that even those familiar with the territory struggle to understand”.
Assignment
Read articles from Scientific American, Quanta, Wired, The Atlantic, Nautilus – note tone, structure, style
Look up different writing guidelines and compile a list of the key points
Audience-Adaptive Communication: Write two 500-word versions of the same science explanation: one for a technical audience, one for lay readers. Focus on adjusting the complexity of language, depth of explanation, and technical details to suit each audience. This exercise enhances versatility in tailoring content appropriately
Explain an article with different perspectives- environmental, economic, medical, historical, ethical
Reading
Lecture 3: Weaving Your Story – Structure, Art and Narrative
Overview
Focus on identifying the plot, and how to structure and outline a compelling science article using narrative tools like hooks and arcs.
Objectives
Understand storytelling elements in science writing
Build effective article outlines
Answer the wh- questions and hook the audience
Create an outline for a story
Write a “hook” paragraph to grab attention. Examples:
Lecture Notes
Our brains are wired for stories, not facts; we like a flow
The story arc: hook → challenge → resolution
Video- Kurt Vonnegut on the shape of stories- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oP3c1h8v2ZQ
The future of Storytelling by Dr. Paul J. Zak
Open with conflict, curiosity, or surprise – what is the problem statement?
Common formats: Problem/Solution, Before/After, Cause/Effect, Future outlook/ wrap up (?)
Assignment
Write the opening 3–4 sentences of an article with a compelling narrative hook
Find a scientific paper and identify the main plot
Reading
Lecture 4: Depth, Breadth, and Style
Overview
Learn how to balance technical depth with an easy and clear narrative. Discuss different stylistic approaches.
Objectives
Learn when to go deep and when to stay broad
Experiment with voice and tone in writing - formal, humorous, descriptive, etc.
Learn to develop and sustain narrative tension in science writing
What is your personal writing voice?
Lecture Notes
Plotting tips: break your idea into sections (beginning, middle, end)
Inverted pyramid of writing: https://ohiostate.pressbooks.pub/stratcommwriting/chapter/inverted-pyramid-style/
Style types and tips: descriptive, analytical, persuasive
Use metaphors, analogies, and “what if” scenarios to deepen narrative
More tips:
Trim the jargon: Every character counts, especially on X/Twitter and Instagram.
Use links sparingly: Redirect to full content (blogs, publications) when space is limited.
Think visually: On platforms like Instagram and TikTok, visuals do well.
Spark curiosity: “Did you know…”, “Why does…”, “Here’s what scientists found…”
Assignment
Write a 250-word paragraph of technical explanation and revise it in 2 different tones: playful and analytical
Identify 2–3 "influences" on your writing voice (books, writers, styles) – authors/ pieces you like and why, and identify the ‘voice’ that appeals to you.
Reading
The Open Notebook: Finding the science in any story
Lecture 5: What Makes Writing Work? (Analyzing Examples)
Overview
Analyze effective/good and ineffective/bad examples of science communication. Emphasize clarity, simplicity, and relatability.
Objectives
Identify hallmarks of good and bad writing
Learn how to edit and critique
Learn to recognize clarity, rhythm, and audience match
Practice rewriting dense science into engaging prose
Critically assess science writing quality
Lecture Notes
Compare two pieces for ‘good’ and ‘bad’ examples, and highlight key differences and why one worked and the other didn’t
Characteristics of bad writing: passive voice, jargon, buried ledes
Characteristics of good writing: clarity, flow, tone-match, visuals (?)
The etiquettes of editing and critiquing
A good exercise for this would be to write or explain a research topic to peers who are experts and include all the jargon you normally would. Then redo it as if you’re explaining it to a teenager with a basic understanding of science. What changed? Can you make it even better with a story instead? What pieces of writing have stayed with you and what drew you to them?
Ed Yong has excellent writing samples that emphasize the power of storytelling. This is one example:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bacteria-turn-plants-and-insects-into-zombies/
Read articles/books by popular science writers such as Carl Zimmer, Steven Strogatz, Philip Ball, Siddhartha Mukherjee, Richard Feynman, Richard Dawkins, and Sarah Zhang, and note down what you like about their writing styles and how they make science engaging.
https://mcb.illinois.edu/news/2025-01-30/new-study-sheds-light-liver-maturation-specialization. Maybe have a discussion on why this doesn’t work as well as Yong.
Another exercise is looking through the Science section of a newspaper and just going over the different reporters and talking about who did something well and who didn’t. What lessons can we learn? What would we change if we were the editor?
Assignment
Rewrite the abstract of a research paper into a blog post
Collectively edit a peer’s draft for clarity and tone – learning exercise
Reading
Lecture 6: Science Communication in the Age of Misinformation
Overview
Use the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study in public trust, misinformation, and the role of scientists online.
Objectives
Understand challenges of online science communication, with a focus on social media ‘viral’ tendencies
Learn strategies to detect and counter misinformation
How are you different from an influencer? (thought exercise: both want views, both need the content to reach more people, science influencers exist so it’s not the subject matter expertise – what’s the difference?)
Understand the mechanics of viral content and misinformation
Write science in concise, engaging forms - 50-word captions and 10-line scripts.
Lecture Notes
Platform breakdown (X/Twitter, linkedin, Instagram): audience, style, tone. One size (of content) does not fit all.
Covid-19 case study: lessons from communication failures
Positives: real-time data sourcing and updates in case of natural disasters (case study Haiti earthquake, hurricane Harvey, California wildfires; accountability for perpetrators, huge public momentum to drive change)
Writing threads, captions, conceptualising visuals, and “hooks” for social media
The ⅓ rule: ⅓ informative, ⅓ engagement, ⅓ curation
Assignment
Pick a topic/ concept. Draft a five-part series of posts for different social media channels. Cater to the audience and tone.
Tweetorial?
Reading
Lecture 7: AI - Ethics, Tools, and Plagiarism
Overview
Examines how AI tools can aid writing, and discusses the ethical concerns in communication and authorship.
Objectives
Explore the benefits and limits of AI in writing
Address ethical concerns in content creation
Understand plagiarism and citation ethics
Learn strategies to ensure originality and avoid plagiarism
Lecture Notes
About AI writing tools (e.g. Chatgpt, Grammarly, other generative AI): drafting, brainstorming, editing
Ethical issues: plagiarism, ghostwriting, fabrication, factual inconsistencies, impact of AI on the environment
Authorship integrity and transparency
Striking a balance: tool vs a crutch
Assignment
Use AI to generate a draft of a science blog, then revise it for accuracy, style, and ethics. Highlight the key drawbacks of AI-generated language in 3-5 points – what can you do that AI cannot?
Write a short reflection of 500 words: what are your boundaries for using AI in your writing?
Write a short 800-word feature on AI, its pros and cons, and the environmental impacts and uses.
Reading
Lecture 8: Science in Policy, Outreach, and Public Trust
Overview
Discusses the role of scientists in public discourse, policy writing, and popular media, with a focus on outreach and awareness. Wrap up the lecture with a list of publishing options for newbies.
Objectives
Understand science’s role in public policy and outreach
Highlight sensitive writing to shape public perceptions and build trust – the downfalls of negative, black and white portrayal.
Look at how to cover policy for social outreach/ awareness
Importance of outreach, and how to write to educate – different forms and tones
Explore science writing platforms and opportunities
Lecture Notes
Writing to influence: memos, policy briefs, op-eds, covering policy decisions
Can you build trust and shape public perceptions? Examples of poorly written pieces on human-wildlife conflict – perpetuate fear. Eg: accusatory language, demonising the animal, non-neutral reporting.
Tool for outreach and awareness – why is this important? Any success stories?
Final article assignment planning: title, audience, platform, hook, goals.
Assignment
Final presentation: 5-minute pitch of your article and strategy
Submit: popular science article + social media posts + optional visual project
Deadlines?
Reading
List of references
Lecture 1: Why Scientists Must Write
“Language is a tool for thinking, not just expression” (Zinsser on writing well)
Pew survey data on declining trust (Pew on science trust)
Lecture 2: Popular Science Writing: Forms, Audiences, and Rules
The Open Notebook: How to begin in science writing
PMCID article on plain language science writing
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/a-note-to-beginning-science-writers
Lecture 3: Weaving Your Story – Structure and Narrative
Steven Pinker: The Sense of Style
Lecture 4: Depth, Breadth, and Style
How do you balance depth and breadth of your topic in a limited time frame?
Lecture 5: What Makes Writing Work? (Analyzing Examples)
Good writing: Bacteria turn plants and insects into zombies
“Bad” writing: New study sheds light on liver maturation, specialization
Lecture 6: Science Communication in the Age of Misinformation
https://www.americanscientist.org/article/fighting-science-misinformation
https://www.sciencespo.fr/en/news/combating-misinformation-on-social-media
Lecture 7: AI – Ethics, Tools, and Plagiarism
AI Writes Scientific Papers That Sound Great—but Aren’t Accurate
Lecture 8: Science in Policy, Outreach, and Public Trust
The intersection of science and public policy
Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries
Public opinion divided over role of scientists in policymaking
Barriers to public outreach — and why scientists need to overcome them
Additional material-
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-25744-001- get paper
https://jcom.sissa.it/article/pubid/JCOM_1805_2019_E/
Videos-